GPT2w模型在南极地区精度分析

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20170487

测绘学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 1316-1325.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20170487

GPT2w模型在南极地区精度分析

孔建^1,3, 姚宜斌^2,3, 单路路², 王泽民¹

1. 武汉大学中国南极测绘研究中心, 湖北武汉 430079;
2. 武汉大学测绘学院, 湖北武汉 430079;
3. 武汉大学地球空间环境与大地测量教育部重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2017-08-30 修回日期:2018-05-05 出版日期:2018-10-20 发布日期:2018-10-24
通讯作者: 单路路 E-mail:llshan@whu.edu.cn
作者简介:孔建(1987-),男,博士,讲师,研究方向为GNSS对流层、电离层建模。E-mail:jkong@whu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2016YFB0501803）；国家自然科学基金（41574028；41604002）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（2042016kf0037）；武汉大学地球空间环境与大地测量教育部重点实验室测绘基础研究基金（16-02-04）

The Accuracy Analysis of GPT2w at the Antarctic Area

KONG Jian^1,3, YAO Yibin^2,3, SHAN Lulu², WANG Zemin¹

1. Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2017-08-30 Revised:2018-05-05 Online:2018-10-20 Published:2018-10-24
Supported by:
The National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0501803);The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41574028;41604002);The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2042016kf0037);The Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy (Wuhan University), Ministry of Education (No. 16-02-04)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： GPT2w（global pressure and temperature 2 wet）是目前应用较为广泛的对流层延迟经验模型之一，可提供气压、温度、水汽压等气象参数。为验证和分析GPT2w模型在南极地区的精度，本文利用分布在南极区域的探空站数据和中国第33次南极科考期间的实测探空气球数据对模型气压、温度、水汽压参数进行分层精度检验。与探空站数据比较发现，在南极地区地面高度上，GPT2w模型精度较高，与全球其他区域精度较为一致；进一步通过对比1月和7月统计结果，发现Bias和RMS呈现出季节特性；同时发现模型在垂直方向存在较大误差，表现为随着高度的增加，精度随之下降并逐步趋于稳定。实测数据对比方面，首先利用ECMWF（European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts）气压分层数据对实测数据的可靠性进行验证，结果显示，实测数据与ECMWF分层数据符合得较好；同时通过比对发现，GPT2w天内精度在地面高度上仍与月平均精度相当，但垂直方向随着高度的增加精度相比于暖季精度会有所下滑，说明未考虑日周期项变化对模型精度存在一定影响。用探空数据计算的对流层延迟（zenith tropospheric delay，ZTD）来分析GPT2w的计算精度，结果表明GPT2w在南极区域ZTD计算精度在厘米级，与全球其他位置计算精度相当。

关键词: GPT2w, 南极地区, 探空站, 探空气球, ECMWF

Abstract: GPT2w (global pressure and temperature 2 wet) is one of the widely used empirical troposphere models, which is usually used to compute the tropospheric parameters, such as pressure, temperature, water vapor pressure etc. In order to analyze the model accuracy around the Antarctic Pole area, the actual data from the radiosonde stations and the measured data during the Chinese 33th Antarctica Expedition are used to test the model parameter's accuracy on different height level. Based on the comparison with the data from the radiosonde stations and GPT2w, it is found that on ground level, the model accuracy at Antarctic Pole area is high, which is consistent with the accuracy at other areas; then by comparing the statistics in January and July, it is found that Bias and RMS showed seasonal characteristics; at the same time, it is found that there is a large error in the vertical direction of the model, which shows that as the height increases, the accuracy decreases and gradually stabilizes.Before the comparison with the measured data and GPT2w, the ECMWF(European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts)data are used to confirm the reliability of the measured data, while the results showed that the two dataset consistent with each other. Meanwhile, by comparison, it is found that the GPT2w accuracy among a day is equal to monthly average accuracy on ground level, but the vertical accuracy decreases with the increase of height compared with the accuracy of the warm season, which shows that there is a certain impact on the accuracy of the model without considering the variation of the daily period. zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) calculated by sounding data is used to analyze the accuracy of GPT2w. The result shows that the accuracy of GPT2w ZTD in the Antarctic is centimeter accuracy, which is equivalent to the accuracy of other areas in the world.

Key words: GPT2w, Antarctic area, radiosonde station, sounding balloon, ECMWF

中图分类号:

P228

孔建, 姚宜斌, 单路路, 王泽民. GPT2w模型在南极地区精度分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(10): 1316-1325.

KONG Jian, YAO Yibin, SHAN Lulu, WANG Zemin. The Accuracy Analysis of GPT2w at the Antarctic Area[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2018, 47(10): 1316-1325.

参考文献

[1] SCHUELER T, HEIN G W, EISSFELLER B. A New Tropospheric Correction Model for GNSS Navigation[C]//Proceedings of GNSS. Sevilla, Spain:[s.n.], 2001:8-11.
[2] ZHANG J, LCHAPELLE, G. Precise Estimation of Residual Tropospheric Delays Using a Regional GPS Network for Real-time Kinematic Applications[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2001, 75(5-6):255-266.
[3] CHEN Qinming, SONG Shuli, ZHU Wenyao. An Analysis for the Accuracy of Tropospheric Zenith Delay Calculated from ECMWF/NECP Data over Asia[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(3):275-283.
[4] 姚宜斌, 胡羽丰, 张豹. 利用多源数据构建全球天顶对流层延迟模型[J]. 科学通报, 2016, 61(24):2730-2741. YAO Yibin, HU Yufeng, ZHANG Bao. Establishment of a Global Zenith Tropospheric Delay Model Using Multi-source Data[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(24):2730-2741.
[5] 赵祥伟, 陈正宇. 全球天顶对流层延迟模型新修正方法[J]. 测绘科学, 2018,43(5):18-22,61. ZHAO Xiangwei, CHEN Zhengyu. The New Correction Method of Global Zenith Total Delay Model[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping,2018,43(5):18-22,61.
[6] HOPFIELD H S. Tropospheric Effect on Electromagnetically Measured Range:Prediction from Surface Weather Data[J]. Radio Science, 1971, 6(3):357-367.
[7] SAASTAMOINEN J H. Atmospheric Correction for the Troposphere and Stratosphere in Radio Ranging Satellites[M]//HENRIKSEN S W, MANCINI A, CHOVITZ B H.The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy.Washington, DC:American Geophysical Union, 1972:247-251.
[8] BLACK H D.An Easily Implemented Algorithm for the Tropospheric Range Correction[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth (1978-2012), 1978, 83(B4):1825-1828.
[9] LAMANCE J, COLLINS P, LANGLEY R. Limiting Factors in Tropospheric Propagation Delay Error Modelling for GPS Airborne Navigation[C]//Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation 52nd Annual Meeting.Cambridge, MA:[s.n.], 1996:519-528.
[10] LEANDRO R, SANTOS M C, LANGLEY R B. UNB Neutral Atmosphere Models:Development and Performance[C]//Proceedings of the 2006 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation.Monterey, California, USA:[s.n.], 2006:564-573.
[11] PENNA N, DODSON A, CHEN Wu. Assessment of EGNOS Tropospheric Correction Model[J]. Journal of Navigation, 2001, 54(1):37-55.
[12] LI Wei, YUAN Yunbin, OU Jikun, et al. New Versions of the BDS/GNSS Zenith Tropospheric Delay Model IGGtrop[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2015, 89(1):73-80.
[13] KRUEGER E, SCHUELER T, ARBESSER-RASTBURG B. The Standard Tropospheric Correction Model for the European Satellite Navigation System Galileo[C]//Proceeding of General Assembly URSI.[s.l.]:[s.n.], 2005.
[14] SCHÜLER T. The TropGrid2 Standard Tropospheric Correction Model[J]. GPS Solutions, 2014, 18(1):123-131.
[15] 姚宜斌, 何畅勇, 张豹, 等. 一种新的全球对流层天顶延迟模型GZTD[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(7):2218-2227. YAO Yibin, HE Changyong, ZHANG Bao, et al. A New Global Zenith Tropospheric Delay Model (GZTD)[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysical, 2013, 56(7):2218-2227.
[16] BÖHM J, MÖLLER G, SCHINDELEGGER M, et al. Development of an Improved Empirical Model for Slant Delays in the Troposphere (GPT2w)[J]. GPS Solutions, 2015, 19(3):433-441.
[17] LAGLER K, SCHINDELEGGER M, BÖHM J, et al. GPT2:Empirical Slant Delay Model for Radio Space Geodetic Techniques[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2013, 40(6):1069-1073.
[18] 胡羽丰. 高分辨率全球天顶对流层延迟模型研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学, 2015. HU Yufeng. Research on Global Zenith Tropospheric Delay Model with High Resolution[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2015.
[19] 姚宜斌, 张豹, 严凤,等. 两种精化的对流层延迟改正模型[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(5):1492-1501. YAO Yibin, ZHANG Bao, YAN Feng, et al. Two New Sophisticated Models for Tropospheric Delay Corrections[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysical, 2015, 58(5):1492-1501.
[20] BEVIS M, BUSINGER S, HERRING T A, et al. GPS Meteorology:Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Water Vapor Using the Global Positioning System[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1992, 97(D14):15787-15801.
[21] 姚宜斌, 曹娜, 许超钤, 等. GPT2模型的精度检验与分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(7):726-733. YAO Yibin, CAO Na, XU Chaoqian, et al. Accuracy Assessment and Analysis for GPT2[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015, 44(7):726-733.
[22] ISIOYE O A, COMBRINCK L, BOTAI J. Performance Evaluation of Blind Tropospheric Delay correction Models over Africa[J]. South African Journal of Geomatics, 2015, 4(4):502-525.
[23] LIU Jiye, CHEN Xihong, SUN Jizhe, et al. An Analysis of GPT2/GPT2w+Saastamoinen Models for Estimating Zenith Tropospheric Delay over Asian Area[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2017, 59(1):824-832.
[24] ZHANG Di, GUO Jiming, CHEN Ming, et al. Quantitative Assessment of Meteorological and Tropospheric Zenith Hydrostatic Delay Models[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2016, 58(6):1033-1043.
[25] WANG Xiaoming, ZHANG Kefei, WU Suqin, et al. Determination of Zenith Hydrostatic Delay and Development of New Global Long-term GNSS-derived Precipitable Water Vapor[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, 2016. DOI:10.5194/amt-2016-264.
[26] CHEN Biyan, LIU Zhizhao. Voxel-optimized Regional Water Vapor Tomography and Comparison with Radiosonde and Numerical Weather Model[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2014, 88(7):691-703.
[27] NIELL AE, COSTER AJ, SOLHEIM FS, et al. Comparison of Measurements of Atmospheric Wet Delay by Radiosonde, Water Vapor Radiometer, GPS, and VLBI[J]. Journal of Atmospheric Oceanic Technology, 2001, 18(6):830-850.
[28] 陈哲, 高杰, 杨旭. IGRA全球站点探空数据集及其资料质量状况分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2013, 29(5):106-111. CHEN Zhe, GAO Jie, YANG Xu. Introduction of IGRA Dataset and Analysis of Its Data Quality[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2013, 29(5):106-111.
[29] 赵庆志. 地基GPS大气可降水量估计及水汽层析研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学, 2014. ZHAO Qingzhi. Study on Atmospheric Precipitable Water Estimation Using Ground-based GPS and Water Vapor Tomography[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology, 2014.
[30] 陈宏斌, 熊永良, 陈志胜, 等. 垂直不均匀分层的地基GPS层析水汽研究[J]. 测绘工程, 2015, 24(5):11-14, 18. CHEN Hongbin, XIONG Yongliang, CHEN Zhisheng, et al.Research on Tomography of Ground-based GPS Water Vapor With Uneven Vertical Stratification[J]. Engineering of Surveying and Mapping, 2015, 24(5):11-14, 18.
[31] 薛骐. 地基GPS水汽反演及水汽层析研究[D]. 重庆:西南交通大学, 2017. XUE Qi. Research on Ground-based GPS Atmospheric Water Vapor Retrieval and Water Vapor Tomography[D]. Chongqing:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017.
[32] THAYER G D.An Improved Equation for the Radio Refractive Index of Air[J]. Radio Science, 1974, 9(10):803-807.

GPT2w模型在南极地区精度分析

The Accuracy Analysis of GPT2w at the Antarctic Area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张文渊, 张书毕, 郑南山, 丁楠, 刘鑫, 马朋序. GNSS/MODIS信号紧耦合水汽层析算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(4): 496-508.
[2]	赵庆志, 姚宜斌, 姚顽强. 顾及层析区域外测站的GNSS水汽层析建模方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(3): 285-294.
[3]	赵庆志, 姚宜斌, 姚顽强, 陈鹏, 吴满意. 利用ECMWF改善射线利用率的三维水汽层析算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(9): 1179-1187.